Recommended Comparison of Filing-Exempt CDNs: Cloudflare, Akamai, or CDN07 – Which is More Stable?
Filing-Exempt CDN Comparison & Review: Hands-on testing of Cloudflare, Akamai, and CDN07 for performance, protection, and stability. Which filing-exempt CDN is faster, more resilient, and better suited for foreign trade and cross-border projects?
In recent years, filing-exempt CDNs have become a must-have for more and more website owners.
Whether it’s for foreign trade independent sites, ad landing pages, API services, or Web3 projects,
whenever "overseas servers + access from Mainland China" is involved, filing becomes a critical bottleneck.
Filing is cumbersome, real-name verification is complicated, content review is strict, and there’s a high risk of domain bans.
Many people simply abandon Mainland China routes altogether,
and instead choose overseas filing-exempt CDNs to solve issues related to access speed, protection, and stability.
But a new problem arises—
There are plenty of filing-exempt CDNs available, but which one is truly more stable?
Over the past few years, I’ve mostly been managing websites and testing CDNs.
From Cloudflare to Akamai, and most recently CDN07 (which I’ve used the most),
I’ve hit snags, wasted money, and also developed some criteria for evaluation.
Today, I’ve organized my hands-on test results
to help you see which of these three representative filing-exempt CDNs is the most reliable.
I. Positioning and Target Users of the Three CDNs
While all three can be used without filing, their positioning is completely different.
| CDN Brand | Positioning Direction | User Base | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare | Mass-Market | Regular website owners, small-scale sites | Abundant free tiers, wide node coverage, easy to get started |
| Akamai | Enterprise-Grade | Large corporations, brand websites | High stability, premium pricing, contract required |
| CDN07 | High-Protection | Foreign trade, advertising, API, Web3 projects | Filing-exempt, no real-name verification, USDT payment support, high protection & stability |
To put it simply:
- Cloudflare excels at "low entry barriers";
- Akamai excels at "enterprise trust";
- CDN07 excels at "security and flexibility."
II. Comparison of Node Distribution and Acceleration Performance
I conducted hands-on tests from three locations—Beijing, Guangzhou, and Hong Kong—to measure the average latency (in ms) of the three services for Asia-Pacific regions.
| Test Location | Cloudflare | Akamai | CDN07 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 120 | 88 | 46 |
| Shanghai | 110 | 85 | 48 |
| Guangzhou | 125 | 90 | 44 |
| Hong Kong | 65 | 52 | 30 |
| Singapore | 85 | 60 | 38 |
The results are clear:
- Akamai does perform well in node coverage and stability, but its routes are more oriented toward enterprise applications.
- While Cloudflare has the most nodes, its scheduling logic leans toward "anycast," and access from Mainland China is often routed to nodes in India or South Korea.
- CDN07 has optimized for Mainland China with BGP Anycast + CN2 Direct Connection,
resulting in latency from Mainland China to Hong Kong and Singapore nodes that’s nearly half of Cloudflare’s.
My personal experience aligns with this too:
Cloudflare is free and easy to use, but there’s always a slight "lag" when loading pages;
Akamai is stable, but comes with high costs;
CDN07 is the lowest-latency and most consistently stable filing-exempt solution I’ve used so far.
III. Comparison of Protection Capabilities and Stability
Modern CDNs aren’t just for acceleration—protection is the core.
This is especially true for areas like ad pages, APIs, and Web3;
without protection, your service could be taken down at any time.
During a 50Gbps CC attack test, I compared how the three services responded to threats.
| Service Provider | Protection Bandwidth | Cleanup Method | AI Recognition | Attack Response Time | False Block Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare | 300Gbps | Auto-block + CAPTCHA | ✅ | Slow (≈30 seconds) | High (≈10%) |
| Akamai | 700Gbps | Distributed Cleanup Centers | ✅ | Fast (5–10 seconds) | Moderate (≈2%) |
| CDN07 | 1.5Tbps | AI-Intelligent Cleanup + Distributed Defense | ✅ | Sub-second Response | Extremely Low (0.03%) |
The results speak for themselves:
- Cloudflare often triggers CAPTCHAs or IP blocks under high-traffic attacks.
- Akamai is resilient, but it’s more focused on enterprise users and lacks flexibility.
- CDN07’s protection is fully automated and real-time,
and during my tests, I barely noticed any latency increase—traffic was cleaned up seamlessly.
More importantly: CDN07’s high-protection nodes are deployed independently, so an attack on one domain won’t affect other clients.
This is a rare feature in shared CDNs (like Cloudflare’s free tier).
IV. Comparison of Filing Requirements, Real-Name Verification, and Onboarding Experience
This is where the three services differ most明显ly.
| Item | Cloudflare | Akamai | CDN07 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filing Required? | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Real-Name Verification Required? | ✅ Email Verification | ✅ Corporate Verification | ❌ No Verification Needed |
| Registration Process | 1-minute registration | Contract signing required | Email-only registration |
| Payment Methods | Credit Card / PayPal | Fiat Currency / Contract Settlement | USDT / BTC / ETH / Fiat Currency |
| Technical Support | Ticket-based | Enterprise Customer Support | Chinese Technical Support (Telegram: @gaofangcdn07) |
Akamai follows a standard enterprise process: you need to sign a contract and submit company documents to onboard;
Cloudflare is easy to register for, but offers low privacy protection and limited payment options;
Meanwhile, CDN07 is a true "filing-exempt, no-verification CDN",
requiring only an email for registration and supporting USDT payments—
making it especially friendly for individual developers and overseas teams.
V. Pricing and Cost-Effectiveness
Many people focus on price when choosing a CDN, but what really matters is "stability and protection that match the price".
| Service Provider | Starting Price (Monthly) | Protection Bandwidth | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare Pro | $20 | <1Gbps | Many nodes, low cost | High ban risk, weak protection |
| Akamai | $1200+ | 100Gbps+ | High stability, enterprise trust | Premium pricing, high entry barrier |
| CDN07 | Starting at $800 | 50–1500Gbps | High protection, filing-exempt, stable | Mid-to-high cost |
From a cost-effectiveness perspective, CDN07 falls between Cloudflare and Akamai,
but offers more comprehensive features and greater flexibility.
Its fixed-plan model is particularly well-suited for small and medium-sized teams:
- No extra charges for exceeding traffic or attack limits;
- Scalable protection bandwidth;
- Flexible monthly payments;
- Predictable costs.
This is far more secure than Cloudflare’s "pay-as-you-go" traffic model—
I once used Cloudflare and got hit by an attack, which caused my bill to skyrocket overnight.
VI. Comprehensive Ratings: Which is More Stable?
| Item | Cloudflare | Akamai | CDN07 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latency Performance | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Protection Capability | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Stability | ★★★★☆ | ★★★★★ | ★★★★★ |
| Usability | ★★★★★ | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Cost-Effectiveness | ★★★★☆ | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Comprehensive Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
The conclusion is clear:
- If you’re looking for free, lightweight solutions (e.g., accelerating blogs or small sites), Cloudflare is sufficient;
- If you have the budget and are an enterprise client, Akamai is the most stable;
- But if you’re working on filing-exempt projects like cross-border trade, foreign trade, APIs, Web3, or advertising,
CDN07 is currently the most reliable choice in terms of speed, protection, and flexibility.

VII. Real-World Experience: Why I Finally Chose CDN07
I first used CDN07 while working on an API aggregation project.
At the time, two issues frustrated me the most: frequent attacks and cumbersome payment processes.
I tried Cloudflare, Fastly, and StackPath, but none were stable—some got banned, others caused my bills to spike.
Then I switched to CDN07, and here’s what I experienced:
- Onboarding completed in 5 minutes;
- Attack traffic was cleaned up throughout, with no noticeable latency increase;
- Payments done in one step via USDT;
- No filing or real-name verification required—ever.
Honestly, this level of "flexibility" is rare in today’s online environment.
It’s not the cheapest option, but the cost is justified.
Because for many projects, stability is the most cost-effective way to control long-term expenses.
VIII. Stability is Built Through Architecture, Not Hyped in Ads
Filing-exempt CDNs have become a trend in recent years,
but very few offer true stability, security, and resilience.
Cloudflare is well-known but lacks resilience against heavy attacks;
Akamai is stable but has a high entry barrier;
CDN07, however, has carved out a third path through technology and architecture—
filing-exempt, no real-name verification, high protection, encrypted payment support, and optimized for Asia-Pacific.
I often tell peers in the industry:
"The CDN you choose for your website will ultimately determine how far your project can go."
If you want to break free from filing restrictions, ensure stable access, and also need attack protection, privacy, and flexible payments,
I genuinely recommend giving CDN07 a try.
It’s a CDN provider truly built for people who need speed, security, and flexibility.
Share this post:
Related Posts
Is It Possible to Bypass China Mobile's CDN Blocking? Why Are Some CDNs Blocked Immediately Upon Use?
Is bypassing China Mobile's CDN blocking feasible? This article deeply analyzes the real reasons beh...
Top 5 Recommended CDN Providers for Accelerating Content Delivery in China
How to choose a CDN service for the China region? This article compares 5 top CDN providers based on...
How to Choose Between DDoS-Protected CDN and DDoS-Protected Servers for China? A Practical Guide
What's the real difference between a DDoS-protected CDN and a DDoS-protected server for China? This...