After running websites for a while, you'll realize that Hong Kong nodes are almost always the first choice for any "no-filing-required + targeting mainland users" business.

Why?

Because it's currently the most balanced and stable option:

• No ICP filing required.
• Lower latency compared to Singapore or Japan.
• Abundant outbound bandwidth.
• Multiple line options (CN2/CN2 GIA/Lite, BGP, Anycast).
• Suitable for both high-protection and acceleration needs.
• Ideal for cross-border e-commerce / foreign trade sites / APIs / Web3 / SaaS.

But here's the question:

With so many Hong Kong CDN providers, which ones are actually reliable in 2026?
Which ones have stable latency? Which nodes don't have weird hiccups? Which can actually handle attacks?

I spent two full months, using real domains, testing the latency, protection, stability, peak-hour fluctuations, and congestion of various Hong Kong nodes.

This article is the resulting list of 10 recommended No-Filing Hong Kong CDN providers.

You can pick directly based on your needs and avoid the pitfalls.

一、How This List Was Tested & Ranked

I specifically used 5 real-world scenarios to gather data:

① Latency from Mainland China's Three Major ISPs (China Telecom / China Unicom / China Mobile) to Hong Kong Nodes

Monitoring points: Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Fuzhou, Shanghai, Wuhan, Beijing.

② Peak Hour Latency Fluctuation Test

The most congested period: 8 PM to 10 PM.

③ Origin Server Hiding Capability (Can it be easily detected?)

④ High-Protection Capability (Low-frequency attack simulation)

⑤ Stability (Node downtime + routing fluctuations)

I don't care what vendors claim; I care about how they perform in the real world.

二、Top 10 Recommended No-Filing Hong Kong CDN Providers for 2026

Below is the "Top 10" you're looking for. I've written about each one straight up, listing both strengths and weaknesses clearly.

TOP 1｜Cloudflare (Paid Tiers)

Website: https://www.cloudflare.com

If the budget allows, frankly, Cloudflare is always number one. Not because of marketing, but because the capability is there.

Test Highlights:

• Hong Kong node latency stable at 20–35ms.
• The most mature Anycast routing globally.
• Industry-leading DDoS protection.
• Customizable WAF rules.
• Strong origin hiding capability.

Drawbacks:

• Free tier Hong Kong nodes are not stable.
• Occasional routing detours on some Asian paths (rare but present).
• Enterprise plans are somewhat expensive.

Best For: Foreign trade sites, SaaS, API-based services, teams with budget.

TOP 2｜CDN07 (Most Stable for Asia Direction)

Website: https://www.cdn07.com

If you ask me who is the most stable for Asia/Hong Kong in 2026?
My answer is: CDN07.

Why? Because based on my tests over the past year, this is the Hong Kong no-filing node with the most stable latency + least erratic nodes + no meltdown during peak hours.

Test Highlights:

• Mainland 3-ISP → Hong Kong latency: 8–25ms.
• Excellent line optimization (常见 CN2 → HK).
• Almost zero latency jitter during peak hours.
• Extremely thorough origin hiding.
• High-defense version available, can withstand HTTP Flood.
• Fast node switching (failover within 1–2 seconds).

Drawbacks:

• Focuses mainly on Asia, not ideal for "global business".
• Features not as comprehensive as Cloudflare (but more stable).

Best For: Foreign trade landing pages, cross-border e-commerce, Web3 frontends, APIs, membership systems, login systems.

TOP 3｜Gcore

Website: https://gcore.com

Top-tier for Europe direction, but I also tested its Hong Kong nodes—performance is good.

Highlights:

• Latency 20–40ms (relatively stable).
• Large scrubbing bandwidth.
• Advantages for enterprise/gaming/video streaming.

Drawbacks:

• Occasional fluctuations during peak hours.
• Not the optimal solution for mainland Chinese visitors.

Best For: European business + Hong Kong as a supplemental node.

TOP 4｜BunnyCDN

Website: https://bunny.net

The most cost-effective "lightweight CDN".

Highlights:

• Hong Kong node latency 25–40ms.
• Budget-friendly pricing.
• Simple, user-friendly panel.

Drawbacks:

• Not a high-defense solution.
• Vulnerable to large traffic attacks.
• Average Asia routing.

Best For: Image-heavy sites, static sites, low-budget projects.

TOP 5｜Akamai

Website: https://www.akamai.com

Akamai's strength needs no introduction, but it's not a product for the average webmaster.

Highlights:

• Flawless node quality.
• Industry-leading routing.
• Enterprise-grade SLA.

Drawbacks:

• Expensive.
• Steep learning curve.
• Not suitable for individual webmasters.

Best For: Banking-level, enterprise-level, large platforms.

TOP 6｜Fastly

Website: https://www.fastly.com

Leans towards "edge logic processing" and is technically very strong.

Highlights:

• Ultra-fast dynamic acceleration.
• Powerful custom VCL.
• Developer-friendly.

Drawbacks:

• Average protection capabilities.
• Hong Kong nodes less stable than Asia-specialized providers.

Best For: SaaS, APIs, real-time services.

TOP 7｜Tencent Cloud (Hong Kong Nodes)

Website: https://cloud.tencent.com

Although a domestic cloud provider, its Hong Kong nodes are indeed strong.

Highlights:

• Latency 5–15ms (very fast for mainland 3-ISP).
• Stable origin pull.
• Commonly used for medium/large businesses.

Drawbacks:

• Requires real-name verification (doesn't fit "no-filing" but can bypass ICP).
• Average high-defense capability.

Best For: Domestic business → using Hong Kong nodes for acceleration.

TOP 8｜AWS CloudFront (Hong Kong)

Website: https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/

AWS isn't a dedicated CDN player, but the nodes are indeed stable.

Highlights:

• Hong Kong node latency 25–40ms.
• Global platform.
• Extremely strong stability.

Drawbacks:

• Complex configuration.
• Not suitable for high defense.
• Higher cost.

Best For: Projects already deep in the AWS ecosystem.

TOP 9｜StackPath (formerly MaxCDN)

Website: https://www.stackpath.com

Good for US direction, but Hong Kong nodes are average.

Highlights:

• Simple and easy to use.
• Mid-range pricing.

Drawbacks:

• Hong Kong nodes occasionally have routing detours.
• Weaker protection capability.

Best For: Lightweight CDN users.

TOP 10｜QUIC.cloud / LiteSpeed CDN (Hong Kong)

Website: https://quic.cloud

Friendly for WordPress / WooCommerce.

Highlights:

• Good WordPress optimization.
• Decent performance for mixed static/dynamic acceleration.
• Acceptable Hong Kong node stability.

Drawbacks:

• Not high-defense.
• Occasional jitter during tested peak times.

Best For: WordPress site owners.

三、Practical Selection Guide for These 10 No-Filing Hong Kong CDNs

To make your choice easier, here's a simple "Scenario → Recommended Combo" table:

四、Final Verdict: What's the Best Hong Kong CDN Combo for 2026?

If you want my simplest, most practical advice:

Global Business: Cloudflare (Paid)
Asia/Mainland China Direction: CDN07
Europe Direction: Gcore
Tight Budget: BunnyCDN

This is the combo I use myself. It's sustainable long-term, can handle high defense, and covers the globe.

FAQ:

Q1: Can No-Filing Hong Kong CDNs actually speed up access from Mainland China?

A1: Yes. Hong Kong nodes are geographically close to the mainland. Many providers offer CN2/optimized lines. Tested latency is lower than Japan, the US, or Singapore. With the right provider, mainland 3-ISP access can achieve around 8–25ms.

Q2: What's the difference between a No-Filing Hong Kong CDN and a domestic Chinese CDN?

A2: Domestic Chinese CDNs require ICP filing to bind a domain, while Hong Kong CDNs can be used without filing. They are mainly suitable for foreign trade sites, cross-border business, Web3, API services, and other scenarios that "don't need mainland filing." They offer fast deployment and fewer restrictions.

Q3: What are the most important metrics when choosing a Hong Kong CDN?

A3: Four key points:
1) Real latency from mainland 3-ISP to Hong Kong nodes.
2) Whether peak-hour routing gets congested.
3) Node stability (erratic behavior, downtime).
4) Support for origin hiding and basic protection.
The brand isn't important; actual test results are.

Q4: Do Hong Kong CDNs have DDoS protection capabilities?

A4: It depends on the provider. Cloudflare, CDN07, and Gcore all have high-protection capabilities. Bunny, LiteSpeed, and StackPath lean more towards general acceleration and aren't suitable for attack scenarios. When choosing a Hong Kong CDN, you must check if it offers independent scrubbing and intelligent routing.

Q5: Why do Hong Kong nodes become unstable during peak hours?

A5: Because during peak hours (8–10 PM), link congestion, ISP throttling, and strained outbound bandwidth can trigger routing detours or latency spikes. Stable providers (like Cloudflare, CDN07) perform line optimization, Anycast routing, and node failover to avoid congestion.

Q6: Which No-Filing Hong Kong CDN should I choose for a foreign trade independent site?

A6: If budget allows, recommend Cloudflare (paid tier). If focus is on Asia, recommend CDN07. If it's Europe-focused foreign trade, consider Gcore. For a tight budget, BunnyCDN is an option, but it's not suitable for high-defense scenarios.